Emergent research and priorities for shark and ray conservation

ABSTRACT: Over the past 4 decades there has been a growing concern for the conservation status of elasmobranchs (sharks and rays). In 2002, the first elasmobranch species were added to Appen- dix II of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES). Less than 20 yr later, there were 39 species on Appendix II and 5 on Appendix I. Despite growing concern, effective conservation and management remain challenged by a lack of data on population status for many species, human−wildlife interactions, threats to population viability, and the efficacy of conservation approaches. We surveyed 100 of the most frequently published and cited experts on elasmobranchs and, based on ranked responses, prioritized 20 research ques- tions on elasmobranch conservation. To address these questions, we then convened a group of 47 experts from 35 institutions and 12 countries. The 20 questions were organized into the following broad categories: (1) status and threats, (2) population and ecology, and (3) conservation and man- agement. For each section, we sought to synthesize existing knowledge, describe consensus or diverging views, identify gaps, and suggest promising future directions and research priorities. The resulting synthesis aggregates an array of perspectives on emergent research and priority directions for elasmobranch conservation.

Salvador J. Jorgensen1,2,49,*,#, Fiorenza Micheli3,4,#, Timothy D. White3,5, Kyle S. Van Houtan1,6, Joanna Alfaro-Shigueto7,8, Samantha Andrzejaczek3,
Natalie S. Arnoldi3, Julia K. Baum9, Barbara Block3, Gregory L. Britten10, Cheryl Butner3, Susana Caballero11, Diego Cardeñosa12, Taylor K. Chapple13, Shelley Clarke14,
Enric Cortés15, Nicholas K. Dulvy16, Sarah Fowler17, Austin J. Gallagher18, Eric Gilman19, Brendan J. Godley20, Rachel T. Graham21, Neil Hammerschlag22, Alastair V. Harry23,24, Michael R. Heithaus25, Melanie Hutchinson26, Charlie Huveneers27, Chris G. Lowe28, Luis O. Lucifora29, Tracy MacKeracher30, Jeffrey C. Mangel7,31,
Ana Paula Barbosa Martins30, Douglas J. McCauley32,33, Loren McClenachan34, Christopher Mull30, Lisa J. Natanson35, Daniel Pauly36, Diana A. Pazmiño37,38, Jennifer C. A. Pistevos39,40, Nuno Queiroz41, George Roff42, Brendan D. Shea18,43,
Colin A. Simpfendorfer37, David W. Sims44,45,46, Christine Ward-Paige47, Boris Worm48, Francesco Ferretti43

All author addresses are given in the Appendix

Related Resources

Snapper otoliths and estimating age: Is there a better way?
To have a good basis for understanding the health of a fished population, scientists need to study the age structures of the fish...
READ MORE
Characterizing seasonal whale shark habitat in the western North Atlantic
There are significant knowledge gaps in the ecology of whale sharks Rhincodon typus beyond well-studied coastal aggregation sites....
READ MORE
Assessing the size, growth rate and structure of a seasonal population of whale sharks using conventional tagging and photo identification
Population size and structure of whale sharks (Rhincodon typus) remain unknown despite their economic importance to targeted tourism...
READ MORE
1 2 3 17